Saturday, November 3, 2012

South Africa unlikely to play a four-pronged pace attack ? Cricket ...

South Africa unlikely to play a four-pronged pace attack ? Cricket News Roundup ? Part 1 ? November 2, 2012

South African assistant coach, Russell Domingo, has ruled out the possibility of fielding an all? pace attack when his team tackles Australia in the opening Test at Brisbane.

Given the pacy nature of the tracks Down Under, it was expected that the touring Proteas could prefer uncapped seamer Rory Kleinveldt ahead of leg-spinner Imran Tahir for the first Test, but Domingo said that the latter will hold his place in order to give the side an added option.

Also with Jacques Kallis in the side, it gives the South Africans further depth in the pace bowling department. "Gone are the days when a South African team goes without a spinner," Domingo said.

England fast bowler, James Anderson, said that his side was satisfied with their performance in the opening warm-up game on tour of India.

Anderson picked up two wickets in each of the innings, while Alastair Cook showcased his batting prowess by notching up 119. Moreover, the likes of Samit Patel and Tim Bresnan also impressed, with the former scoring a well-crafted hundred, while the latter took four wickets during the game. The match further saw Kevin Pietersen returning to the England set-up for the first time since August.

"I think it was pretty good," Anderson said. ?The bowlers got a decent bowl under the belt, a few [batsmen] got decent hits out in the middle and that's pretty much all we could expect."

Australian teenage fast bowler, Pat Cummins, has been ruled out of the upcoming Australian season after suffering a lower back injury.

The pacer will miss his second consecutive home summer since making his Test debut last year against South Africa. The 19-year-old picked up the injury during the recently concluded Champions League T20, where he represented the victorious Sydney Sixers.

He is also likely to take little part in the team?s trip to India (in February), and could be further sidelined from the Ashes series in mid next year.

"We expect he will recover fully from this injury and will be closely monitored to determine his return to the playing field, but expect that he will miss most of the 2012-13 domestic cricket season," Alex Kountouris, the team physio, said.?

Source: http://blogs.bettor.com/South-Africa-unlikely-to-play-a-four-pronged-pace-attack-Cricket-News-Roundup-Part-1-November-2,-2012-a198552

where the wild things are josh smith birdsong teresa giudice atlanta hawks flyers 2012 white house correspondents dinner

Video: Romney camp to make up ground after pausing for Sandy (cbsnews)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/260024579?client_source=feed&format=rss

meningitis bobby valentine bobby valentine pbs nicki minaj miguel cabrera Karrueche Tran

Angkor Wat Temple mystery solved

The massive sandstone bricks used to construct the 12th-century temple of Angkor Wat were brought to the site via a network of hundreds of canals, according to new research.

The findings shed light on how the site's 5 million to 10 million bricks, some weighing up to 3,300 pounds (1,500 kilograms), made it to the temple from quarries at the base of a nearby mountain.

"We found many quarries of sandstone blocks used for the Angkor temples and also the transportation route of the sandstone blocks," wrote study co-author Estuo Uchida of Japan's Waseda University, in an email.

In the 12th century, King Suryavarman II of the Khmer Empire began work on a 500-acre (200 hectare) temple in the capital city of Angkor, in what is now Cambodia. The complex was built to honor the Hindu god Vishnu, but 14th-century leaders converted the site into a Buddhist temple.

  1. Science news from NBCNews.com

    1. Scientists foresaw storm's flood ? but now what?

      Science editor Alan Boyle's blog: Researchers have issued warnings for years that the New York metro area was susceptible to a catastrophic storm surge, but they don't feel any better about it now that they've been proven right.

    2. Storm kills legions of NYU lab mice
    3. Subway rats may flood NYC streets
    4. The science of Halloween's scariest creatures

Archaeologists knew that the rock came from quarries at the base of a mountain nearby, but wondered how the sandstone bricks used to build Angkor Wat reached the site. Previously, people thought the stones were ferried to Tonle Sap Lake via canal, and then rowed against the current through another river to the temples, Uchida told LiveScience.

To see whether this was the case, Uchida's team surveyed the area and found 50 quarries along an embankment at the base of Mount Kulen. They also scoured satellite images of the area and found a network of hundreds of canals and roads linking the quarries to the temple site. The distance between the quarries and the site along the route Uchida's team found was only 22 miles (37 kilometers), compared with the 54 miles (90 km) the river route would have taken.

The grid of canals suggests the ancient builders took a shortcut when constructing the temple, which may explain how the imposing complex was built in just a few decades.

Follow LiveScience on Twitter @livescience. We're also on Facebook? and Google+.

? 2012 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49642111/ns/technology_and_science-science/

the stand josh mcdaniels cotton bowl wizards of waverly place cedric benson playoff schedule charles addams

What You Can Learn From 'The Sessions' | Psychology Today

The new movie The Sessions tells the true story of poet Mark O?Brien who lost the use of his body?s muscles in childhood as a result of Polio. The movie is based on the essay ?On Seeing a Sex Surrogate? which Mark wrote in 1990 about his experience of seeing a sex surrogate at the age of 36 to learn about sexuality with a partner for the first time in his life. Due to the requirement of spending all but a few hours a day in a contraption called an iron lung, Mark had been isolated from peers from the age of 6 through adolescence and robbed of the common experience young adults have of experimenting with sexual relationships thereby learning what they like and don?t like from different experiences. It?s not until his mid-twenties when he attended the University of Berkeley where he studied journalism that he even gets to develop his social skills.

The lessons learned from this film offers the audience a critical opportunity to contemplate the ways in which most people in American society are robbed of a positive accurate sexual education. I have seen non-disabled clients over the years who have felt the same fear, self-loathing and frustration about their own particular sexual desires as Mark did. Similar to Mark, these are people who were well-educated, intelligent, and successful in their livelihoods but had either been taught negative things about sexuality by parents, teachers and spiritual leaders or had been raised in a vacuum of no information at all. This led them to believe as Mark did, that their desires were perverted and/or sinful. He wrote: ?The attitude I absorbed was not so much that polite people never thought about sex, but that no one did. I didn?t know anyone outside my family, so this code affected me strongly, convincing me that people should emulate the wholesome asexuality of Barbie and Ken, that we should behave as though we had no 'down there?s' down there.?

Many of my clients are filled with misconceptions, myths, and extreme shame about the erotic desires and physical arousal that are part of most people?s sexual response cycle. Whether they have been brought up in a religious faith that forbids any romantic contact before marriage like practicing Muslims, traditional Indians (or Indian-Americans), or Orthodox Jews, or clients who had families that made negative comments about sex as they were growing up, these clients all struggle to find a way to integrate their belief systems with their erotic desires and or behaviors.

It is my role as a therapist to ask the right questions to find out what a client?s goals are regarding their sex life and to determine what emotional, psychological and physical impediments need to be addressed and by whom. I am respectful of a client or a couple?s desire to adhere to their religious traditions while offering them basic information that will allow them to begin to decide for themselves what they want in their sexual life.

Mark struggled with his Catholic faith and his family upbringing as he contemplated seeing a sex surrogate writing: ?What would my parents think? What would God think?? Mark O?Brien had fallen in love with people in his life (including a caretaker and a fellow student at University of Berkeley) but his feelings had not been reciprocated and he felt the opportunities to give and get sexual pleasure within a marriage seemed few as he couldn?t even get a date. He consulted with both his therapist, another therapist who specialized in sex therapy and a Catholic priest to help him come to the decision to work with a sex surrogate. All these counselors gave Mark their perspective and useful information without putting pressure on him one way or another.

What people can learn from this film is that the many people who grow up feeling ashamed of their sexual thoughts have few people to whom they can go to who are willing and able to tell them the facts as well as process the feelings that can go along with sex. Instead, misinformed lessons are learned through the romanticized Hollywood romantic-comedies in which the amount of time it takes for a woman to get thoroughly turned on is reduced to some short period of making out before the clothes are ripped off. The hot passionate scenes abound in American films in which safer sex is never discussed before sex, men never stop to put on a condom and women climax with delight without any foreplay and through intercourse alone.

And more recently, there is the modeling for teens and young men of partner-sex based solely on the viewing of porn which is a format created solely for erotic entertainment and fantasy. Porn has little realistic information to offer young men in terms of how mutual sexual relationships should be negotiated, the wide variety of women?s sexual desires and response cycle and the visual modeling of how partners can be both givers and receivers of pleasure. Porn does not illustrate the way in which feelings of love might be integrated into a sexual union. And porn, like the movies never exhibits a man losing his erection and the many reactions he might experience and receive from a partner in that situation.

After getting his priest?s blessing, Mark learns that his body can be a source of immense playful, sensual pleasure and that he can give pleasure to a woman through his sessions with Cheryl, a sexual surrogate whom he hires to teach him about sexuality. Through body awareness exercises he finds out what types of touch he enjoys, what tickles and which ones are annoying. He asks Cheryl in a direct way whether she enjoys having her ear licked and she answers no but that some women might and supports him in his asking. Verbal discussions and non-verbal total body touching are critical skills to develop as part of anyone?s sexual repertoire.

When he eventually learns how to have intercourse he finds out that all the sensual play beforehand and after intercourse can be part of a tremendously moving and sensual experience, and is an important part of a person?s life. Mark also comes to feel entitled to express that part of him. He writes: ?Another lesson learned: sex is a part of ordinary living, not an activity reserved for gods, goddesses, and rock stars. I realized that it could become a part of my life if I fought against my self-hatred and pessimism.? Important lessons indeed.

?

Source: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/sex-esteem/201211/what-you-can-learn-the-sessions

the situation tim tebow jets katy perry part of me video photoshop cs6 beta cate blanchett nfl news tebow

Jos? Andr?s Dishing Out Food Politics, Policy This Spring | Heard ...

Restaurateur Jos? Andr?s is exporting his insights into the intersection of food and culture to George Washington University. And he will share the sum total of his experience?with those who carve out room in their spring schedule to join his inaugural ?World on a Plate? course.

The class marks a new chapter in Andr?s? relationship with the university. He has previously served on GWU?s Urban Food Task Force, advised GWU President Steven Knapp on food policy issues and assisted in the development of the School Without Walls pilot program.

?Food is that thread that runs through the fabric of society: culture, energy, art, science, the economy, national security, the environment, health, politics and diplomacy,? Andr?s said in a release touting his leap from Think Food Group boardroom to classroom, adding, ?Eating is the one thing, besides breathing, that we all do from the day we are born until the day we die.?

The globe-trotting toque and newly minted American Chef Corps member ? part of a group of 90-odd cheflebrities tapped to be ?chef ambassadors? by the State Department earlier this year ? won?t lead every class discussion but is expected to help craft the curriculum.

While the syllabus remains a work in progress, a GWU aide held out hope that themes including ?food and public health,? ?food and national security,? ?food and international aid,? ?hunger? and ?obesity? would be addressed throughout the semester.

??Food and Politics? will not only look back at how the government shaped many of our food choices, but also to today at agro-business lobbyists, the farm bill, the food pyramid and food plate discussions,? the GWU spokeswoman suggested.

Those tentatively expected to pinch hit when Andres steps away from the plate include: Agriculture Department Food Safety Deputy Administrator Philip Derfler, ?What?s Cooking Uncle Sam?? exhibit curator Alice Kamps, ?On Food and Cooking? author Harold McGee and ?Bizarre Foods? host Andrew Zimmern.

Andr?s? course is just the latest in a string of food-related discussions GWU has fostered at its Foggy Bottom campus. The school has explored the primal topic across various disciplines, including: ?Sociology of Food? (sociology), ?People, Land and Food? (geography), ?Let?s Eat: Food and American Culture? (Judaic studies program), ?Recipes, Politics and Power? (writing program) and ?Global Food Security? (international affairs), as well as a non-credit ?Seminar on Food? delving into topics as diverse as the politics of ?fresh? food to school lunches. A separate dean?s seminar on ?Food Politics? is also being added to the course catalog in early 2013.

Source: http://www.rollcall.com/news/jos_andrs_dishing_out_food_politics_policy_this_spring-218629-1.html

the perfect storm hard boiled eggs sound of music mickelson how to tie a tie green bean casserole sweet potato recipes

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Nadia G Spices Up Your Dishes | Mademan.com

nadia-g-likes-her-some-bacon

Nadia Giosia isn?t your average food show host. On Cooking Channel?s Bitchin? Kitchen, she?s a sexy, tattooed Julia Childs for a younger, edgier audience. The 32-year-old Montreal native started cooking at the age of 11 and, in her words, ?sucked pretty hard at it.? But making meals was an important part of her family growing up. ?We were food obsessed. Cooking was how we expressed ourselves.?

-

?Everyone likes to have a good meal made for them. If you cook for a woman you?re going to get a lot of? props.?

-

Her show attempts to breathe new life into the cooking show genre. ?We wanted to bring a bit of comedy to it and do things around themes, like breakup brunches and dysfunctional family dinners.? You don?t need a special theme to eat right, however. Nor does Nadia G think it?s terribly hard for a single man living alone to eat right. ?In general, people eat too much meat,? she advises. We can only imagine that this is doubly true of the man who eats out a lot or microwaves just about every meal he consumes, but G has some easy answers.

Chicken breast is an excellent choice for the man who wants a no-frills, protein-rich dinner. ?Marinate it for 24 hours in full-fat yogurt and add some cilantro,? advises Miss G, who says that not only does the yogurt provide flavor and tenderize the meat, it also supplies healthy bacteria. And now you?ve got some versatility. Do you want fajitas? Something simpler like chicken breast drizzled in olive oil? Greek-style wraps? Make any of these dishes happen easily with a few extra ingredients.

What? Oh, like you don?t keep a shiny silver skull on your stove at all times?

Stews are another good option for the single guy on the go. ?Stew doesn?t take a lot of time to prepare and you can eat it for days.? It also allows you to make use of all the bits and pieces of other food you might otherwise throw out.

Pasta is an old standby from the days of Top Ramen for breakfast, but G suggests doing it in a healthier, more adult fashion. ?Pasta fazool is Italian for ?broke ass,?? she jokes, adding that if you?re going to dare to be lazy, you absolutely, positively must have organic stock.? When dressing it, never use cheap canned parmesan. Always get the real thing. ?Calling that powdered junk ?parmesan? is like calling Nickelback a rock band.? And that?s coming from a Canadian!

Of course, at the end of the day, well-prepared food isn?t just about your health. It?s also a great way to woo the ladies. ?Everyone likes to have a good meal made for them,? says G. ?If you cook for a woman you?re going to get a lot of? props.? Interpret that anyway you want, then check out the relatively simple, positively bitchin? chicken, pasta and bacon chocolate dishes on the following pages. (We threw in some bonus shots of our new favorite chef as well.) Bon appetit!

Mango-Avocado Chicken

Ingredients:

2 cups plain yogurt
3 garlic cloves plus a little extra, degermed
1 tbsp fresh ginger, peeled
1 cup fresh cilantro plus a little extra, chopped
Salt
Pepper
2 chicken breasts
2 limes
2 tbsp extra virgin olive oil
1 tbsp honey
1/2 tsp dijon mustard
1 jalapeno pepper
3 ripe mangos
1 ripe avocado
Brown rice, optional

Method:

Chicken marinade: In a food processor, combine yogurt, garlic, peeled ginger, 1 cup cilantro and a small pinch of sea salt and freshly cracked pepper to taste. Blend until smooth. Pour the marinade into a large Ziploc bag. Rinse the chicken breasts, pat dry and add to the marinade. Smush them around and place the bag in the fridge for 24 hours.

Lime-cilantro dressing: In a jar, combine the juice of 2 limes, olive oil, honey and Dijon mustard. Add a big pinch of finely chopped fresh cilantro, a small pinch of garlic, 1 teaspoon minced jalapeno pepper flesh (add seeds if you like it hot), a small pinch of sea salt and lots of freshly cracked pepper. Cover the jar and shake until thick.

Heat the grill to high and sear the marinated chicken breasts in a skillet for 2 minutes per side. Turn grill to medium-low and cook for an additional 5 to 6 minute per side. In a bowl combine slices of ripe yellow mango and ripe avocado. Drizzle with 2 tablespoons of lime-cilantro dressing and mix to coat. Combine with chicken breasts and serve with a side of brown rice (optional).

Like we said, not your average food show host?


Source: http://www.mademan.com/f4f-nadia-g-spices-up-your-dishes/

Johnny Lewis pnc Honey Boo Boo yom kippur yom kippur avengers soa

Methodological pluralism ? media/anthropology

by Geoff Payne via The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods (2006)

Print pages: 174-176

Definition

An approach that advocates flexibility in the selection of social research methods, based on the principle of choosing the most suitable methods for the nature of the problem being researched. More generally, methodological pluralism calls on the researcher to be tolerant of other people?s preferred methods even when they differ from one?s own.

Distinctive Features

From time to time, disagreements among social scientists about which are the ?best? social research methods become more vocal and indeed, confrontational. An example of this is the competition between older, ethnographic research styles associated with sociologists at the University of Chicago, and the (then newer) work based on social surveys being promoted by Harvard and Columbia after World War II. In the UK a conflict between quantitative methods and several newer forms of qualitative research took place during the 1970s. These disputes are usually marked by antagonistic criticisms of published work, lengthy expositions in defence of particular methods, and even personal abuse.

Methodological pluralism, promoted by Bell and Newby (1977), rejected the idea that one type of methods was automatically better than another. They argued that it was healthy for sociology to contain a number of different theoretical perspectives, and that while each perspective tended to imply a given method of research, each new research project should be tackled on the basis of its own particular features. The research methods selected for the project should be the ones that best fitted the characteristics of the phenomena being studied.

For example, studies of the national rates at which something was occurring, or projects dealing with simpler concepts that could be relatively easily measured, were better suited to social surveys, pre-coded questionnaires and other quantitative methods. On the other hand, when more detail was required, or phenomena were complex, subtle, or unclear, this was more suited to research by observation, less structured interviews, ethnographic description and other qualitative styles. Not every researcher would use every style of research during their careers, nor should they be proficient in all research methods. The plurality would be achieved in the total research output of the discipline as a whole (Bell and Roberts, 1984).

Evaluation

Despite the common sense of methodological pluralism, more sociologists pay lip-service to it than actively adopt it as a philosophy. The main reason is that during their education and early careers, each researcher acquires a set of personal preferences for one type of social science over others. This is not just a question of technical skills, but rather an interest in certain topics and a philosophical view of the social world and how it can be analysed.

There are genuine differences between schools of research, from those seeking to involve and empower the people being researched, through to those that regard ?respondents? merely as sources of information, and from those that see the social world as intricately interconnected and difficult to ?know?, to those that concentrate on the generality of patterned associations between small sets of ?variables?. While not always consciously returning to the complex social theories that underlie their positions, researchers read mainly a sub-set of the literature written by like-minded colleagues, defining research problems in specific ways, and therefore carry out their research using a narrow repertoire of methods.

In some cases, this results only in a rather focused approach, without much concern for other approaches. In others, the intellectual context of the research is strongly associated with a particular method: the context defines what is worth researching, how it should be researched and what order of interpretations can be made. In its more extreme form this results in ritualized denunciation of alternatives often becoming a part of publication. Where some researchers adhere to a ?standpoint? position, their intention is an explicitly ideological one which goes beyond just making new discoveries, to the promotion of the interests of one particular group. Challenging other researchers? methods is one way of undermining the position of rival interest groups (Payne and Payne, 2004: 89-93, 152-7).

Such out-of-hand dismissal because of the type of methods a study has used is a different matter from legitimately debating the competency of its research basis, when that is part of a general evaluation. However, it would be wrong to portray academic life as consisting solely of calm, rational, philosophical debate. Academics also compete for resources (research funding, access to journals, tenured posts, career promotion) in just as determined a way as do people in other walks of life. Attacking the type of research methods used by rivals is one weapon in the struggle between individuals, and institutions, for supremacy.

Not surprisingly, methodological pluralism?s failure to recognize these processes has meant that its call for toleration has largely gone unheeded. For example, in the UK the sociology that has been published in recent years has depended heavily on a narrow range of qualitative methods. A recent study of journal papers found only a minority using quantitative methods: only 2.6 per cent ?involved bivariate analysis and were written by sociologists at British universities, and only 8 (3.5%) involved multivariate techniques ? This can hardly be described as methodological pluralism? (Payne et al., 2004: 160).

Geoff Payne

Associated Concepts:

Key Readings

Bell, C. and Newby, H. (1977) Doing Sociological Research. London: Allen & Unwin.

Bell, C. and Roberts, H. (eds) (1984) Social Researching. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Payne, G. and Payne, J. (2004) Key Concepts in Social Research. London: Sage.

Payne, G., Dingwall, R., Payne, J. and Carter, M. (1981) Sociology and Social Research. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Payne, G., Williams, M. and Chamberlain, S. (2004) ?Methodological pluralism in British sociology?, Sociology, 38 (1): 153-63.

Like this:

Be the first to like this.

Source: http://johnpostill.com/2012/10/31/methodological-pluralism/

king arthur king arthur there will be blood there will be blood nigel barker 420 secret service

Wednesday, October 31, 2012

VIP Services is Tulsa Auto Detailing Best Shop | RemindDates.com ...

It is very hard today to find a good quality car detail. So I want to tell you about a company I found that you will love. VIP Services has already been taking treatment of Tulsa?s main vehicle dealers for the last numerous years and is right now obtainable to provide you using the very same specialist care and diligent service! Our experienced technicians at VIP Services can detail any car, truck, SUV, motorcycle, boat, or recreational car, but we do over just detail. We can also execute paint touch-up, clear coat scratch removal, paint and cloth protection, buffing, and interior repairs to assist your automobile appear great and last longer! We have several packages to fit any spending budget or need and may customize one to your certain needs. Or, just cease by for a rapid hand wash and tire shine for only $10. Let VIP Services assist you to to feel proud to drive your car once again or enable you to sell your vehicle for more money in less time! VIP Services is your complete car detailing and reconditioning service. Here are several of their services?

With using a very particular circular Polisher they can achieve a true paint restoration of spider web scratches and dulled paint. This careful process is done with the use of specialized training that their detail technicians have received from Car Brite and the use of Black Pearl a body shop safe system. We will not fill in scratches and cover them up?but will truly remove them and restore your paint luster. Samantha Johnson from Tulsa, liked the work they did on removing the scratches of her vehicle.

Places like churches, universities, daycare, community teams, and retirement living homes all have large autos. Many organizations and gov departments have them. What am I speaking about? Big vans, travel buses, and numerous other people movers. At VIP Services we are able to deal with these nasty staining that will get ground into the floor and the great number of drink unsightly stains around the seats-and the most detrimental of all?.. dissolved, gooey sweet. It could be considered a overwhelming job to try to keep vans like these clean. They?re always busy moving folks and also you generally do not have time to check for spills in the way back-much less scrub and scrub to clean up them. Let VIP Services have these vehicles clean for you personally and on a typical schedule so you are able to effectively represent your business or business to your people as well as the general public.

Nowadays there?s a very large misunderstanding among a Detail Technician and Car Washer. At any day, someone will go buy a power washing machine, some soap and wax and title them selves a detailer. With regards to rejuvenating the paint with a $50,000 automobile which 1 would you like?.or a skillfully educated detail technician or a dude who wipes cars? Stop over and allow them to demonstrate how they are able to expertly detail your current automobile.

Chair unsightly stains are so frustrating!! Several times possibly the discolored region grows bigger the more you try to wash, or it appears to become gone simply to return once the area dries. How about these greyish fabric car seats that water mark with the slightest drip water? If you attempt to clean them, more stains!! These are typical difficulties that folks (even other detail guys) give us constantly. Most stains Can be washed of seats with all the proper tools and technique.

Want to find out more about Tulsa Detailing Services, then visit VIP?s site on how to choose the best Tulsa Auto Detail for your needs.

Source: http://business.reminddates.com/vip-services-is-tulsa-auto-detailing-best-shop

ann arbor news ides of march elizabeth smart nick young south dakota state long beach state beasley

Source: http://kareemsellers.typepad.com/blog/2012/10/vip-services-is-tulsa-auto-detailing-best-shop-reminddatescom.html

jetblue captain los angeles dodgers christie brinkley seattle mariners geraldo rivera supreme court health care joe oliver

Source: http://mercadofelton8889.typepad.com/blog/2012/10/vip-services-is-tulsa-auto-detailing-best-shop-reminddatescom.html

zac brown band aubrey born to run pranks pregnancy test april fools day 2012 ja rule

Monday, October 29, 2012

Kristina England - Writer: So when did you start writing?

I think most writers get this question so I'll answer it for you today.? It's a two-fold question really as most people ask me when I started writing poetry but it's not a good baseline for when I really took pen to paper.

My mother can tell you that as soon as I could speak, I was a storyteller.? I was the child that didn't have an imaginary friend.? I had an imaginary city.? That's right, an imaginary city in my parents' bathroom.? The weird random diamonds scattered across their bathroom wall became windows to apartment buildings in which all my imaginary friends had different lives going on.

My mom would probably have a better idea on how old I was when this city begain but I do know that I was extremely young - probably around 5 years old.?

By the time I was hanging out at my grandmother's house, either my mother or my grandmother decided I needed to write my stories down.? So I got post-it pads in which I wrote stories on multiple stickies at six and seven years of age.?

My mom then trained me on her typewriter and away I went with my first "novella" at 8 years old.? Needless to say, I didn't finish the novella.

What I discovered later on in my teens was anything over three pages long became a never ending project.? I could never tie up the story.? If I kept it short, it wrapped up, but epic was never really my thing.

At 15, I was introduced to "creative writing" in the classroom, which included poetry.? I didn't quite get poetry but I wrote my first haiku and was all excited when it was one of three poems in the class that the teacher submitted to a contest.

I stopped writing for a year around this time as I was a teenager and although I loved telling stories, I wanted to socialize, not sit down in a corner and write.

At 16, I lost my favorite math teacher to suicide and found the need to sit in a corner and write.? I returned to poetry, not fiction, and began to write about my feelings rather than about imaginary characters.? This decision would help me through a year and a half of watching my grandfather deteoriate from Alzheimers and his expected death in December 1998.

I would then turn to writing personal (or confessional) poetry in college and grad school.? It wasn't until after grad school that I returned to storytelling in my poetry - I no longer felt the need to write about me.

There was a point in undergrad that I actually went back to fiction for a year and entertained my dorm room buddies with spooky stories, but it was only a phase as I decided to commit myself to my poetry from that point on.

Why write about this now?? Well, it's always helpful to understand the writer's history.? It also ties into where I am now.? Recently, I not only started writing form poetry, but I've also found myself craving more than poetry.? It's the reason I relaunched Worcester Storytellers.? It's also the reason I started writing fiction again.? I had a failed attempt at a fiction piece a few months ago but it was more because the story didn't feel right.? Yesterday, I had a piece come to me that felt right and so I sat down and have been working on it ever since.

It's funny how everyone's story is different.? Some people picked up the pen due to a major change in their life.? Others, like me, started writing at such an early point in life, we can't even remember not writing.?

The many layers of life and how those layers unfold is what makes it so beautiful and vulnerable at the same time.? It's the challenges that make us think a different way and shift with the tides.? But it's all worth it in the end (at least, I'm a firm believer in that idea).

Source: http://kristinaengland.blogspot.com/2012/10/so-when-did-you-start-writing.html

julianne hough brandy calvin johnson calvin johnson michael pineda charles taylor bruins

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Day Two Story? (talking-points-memo)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, News Feeds and News via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/256127018?client_source=feed&format=rss

war of the worlds rock and roll hall of fame severe weather wichita brian wilson storm chasers david blaine

Accounting and Accounting Information - Essay Depot

Page 1

?Experience using accounting in
Business or your personal life?

Cassandra Daniels
Everest College
Principles of Accounting 1- APA2111
Instructor: Geraldine Mann

Page 2
I really do not have that much experience using accounting. I can speak on what I have learned and researched about accounting. I plan on owning my own business in the future, so as of now I am attending Everest College and my major is ?Business Management.? So as I write this essay, I will be speaking on what I have learned about accounting and accounting information.
To begin with, Accounting requires ethical approach, and it deals with having access to money and financial records can be too much for people. Some people will try to take advantage of their inside information to make illegal stock trades. They might try to steal from the company that does not trust them much with financial duties. As I researched it stated that ?Technology changed the way that small business accounting works.? (http://academicsecrets.com/graduate-work/mba-and-accounting-essays/the-positive-impact-of-accounting/). So with that being stated, computer programs and friendly applications helps owners keep track of their financial data. So accounting can help you in your business, but it can also affect you if you don?t keep track of your data like you are supposed to.
Finally accounting will be part of my career in the future because I?m going to own my own company and management accounting is one of the major part in owning your own business. Getting a degree in business is something I always wanted. It teaches me everything I need to know to begin a successful career in this field. People with good interpersonal skill, and who are dedicated is what the business profession are looking for.

References
(http://academicsecrets.com/graduate-work/mba-and-accounting-essays/the-positive-impact-of-accounting/)

Source: http://www.essaydepot.com/doc/60272/Accounting-And-Accounting-Information

humber perfect game ufc 145 fight card ufc145 chimpanzee chimpanzee the lucky one pittsburgh pirates

ONTD_Political - Mitt Romney's Pregnancy Problem

HE SUMMER of 1983 was blistering hot in New England. A record heat wave saw temperatures soar toward the 100-degree mark from June well into September. July had been the hottest month ever recorded at Boston's Logan Airport.

The region's beloved Boston Red Sox, full of hope and promise early in spring and claiming first place in the American League East as late as June 1, apparently melted in the heat, losing game after game and tumbling to last place by mid-July, where they were to remain the rest of the season.

It was also during the sweltering summer of 1983 that the family of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney made its celebrated escape from the oppressive New England heat for the cooler climes of Beach O'Pines, Ontario, where the Romney family owns a beachfront cottage in a gated community on the shores of Lake Huron. Prior to departure, Mitt Romney placed the family dog?an Irish setter named Seamus?into a dog carrier and lashed it to the roof of the family's Chevy station wagon for the 12-hour drive into Canada.

The infamous dog ride (dubbed the "Seamus incident") was to become a full-blown issue in the 2012 presidential primaries, as Romney's chief Republican opponent, Rick Santorum, invoked the incident to attack Romney's "character."

Political cartoonists and late-night comedians had a field day with the story. The incident inspired aNew Yorker?cover, while the punk band Devo recorded a song entitled, "Don't Roof Rack Me, Bro." ABC's Diane Sawyer, in an interview with Romney during the primaries, dubbed it the "most wounding thing in the campaign so far."

A far more ominous tale in the Romney canon also took place that summer, one that has been largely swept under the rug as the former governor of Massachusetts challenges incumbent Barack Obama for the presidency. There have been no songs written about it, no cartoons, no gags on late-night television, no magazine covers.


It was in August of that year, shortly after the Romney family returned from their vacation to Lake Huron, that a pregnant woman in her late 30s?Carrel Hilton Sheldon?was informed by her doctor that she had a life-threatening blood clot lodged in her pelvic region.

In treating the clot, Sheldon was administered an overdose of the blood thinner Heparin, an overdose that not only resulted in significant internal bleeding, but also extensive damage to her kidneys, to the point where she was on the verge of needing a transplant. Her life was clearly in peril.

Sheldon's doctor advised her that the overdose of Heparin might have also harmed her 8-week-old fetus and, given the possible fatal repercussions to her, he recommended that she abort her pregnancy.

Sheldon, a mother of four at the time (a fifth child had died as an infant), was then a practicing member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS), outside of Boston. The LDS leader in Massachusetts at that time, called the "stake president," was a Harvard-trained physician, Dr. Gordon Williams, and he counseled Sheldon to follow her doctor's advice to terminate the pregnancy and protect her own life, so that she could continue caring for her four living children.

"Of course, you should have the abortion," she recalled him saying.

According to an account later written anonymously by Sheldon for the LDS women's journal,Exponent II, it was after receiving this counsel from her Williams supporting the potentially life-saving procedure that she experienced an uninvited visit in her hospital from her Mormon bishop at the time, 36-year-old Mitt Romney, who adamantly opposed the abortion.

"He regaled me with stories of his sister and her retarded child and what a blessing the child had been to the family," Sheldon wrote of the incident. "He told me that 'as your bishop, my concern is with the child.'"

Mitt Bishop

Mormon congregations are called "wards" or "branches," depending on their size. There are no full-time "priests" or "ministers," as there are in most Protestant and Catholic churches, but rather lay "bishops," chosen to serve as the spiritual leaders of their wards.

Larger amalgamations of LDS churches are called "stakes," and their leaders, also lay members of the church, are called "stake presidents," something akin, according to the official LDS website, to the position of a bishop in a Catholic diocese.

By the time of his visit to Sheldon's hospital room, Romney was a rising star in Mormon circles. In the early 1970s, while completing both his MBA and his law degree at Harvard, he served in his LDS ward as a bishop's assistant, a religious instructor for teens, and as a "church elder."

In 1981, when he was only 34-years-old, he was named bishop of a ward just outside of Boston and was serving in that capacity when he confronted Sheldon about her pending abortion.

There was no empathy forthcoming from Romney, according to Sheldon, no warmth or sympathy. Moreover, Sheldon contends, Romney cast doubt on her story about the stake president's approval. He simply didn't believe her. He threatened to call him and track him down. He didn't seem to care a lick about her personal well-being.

"At a time when I would have appreciated nurturing and support from spiritual leaders and friends," Sheldon wrote, "I got judgment, criticism, prejudicial advice, and rejection."

In essence, Romney strapped Sheldon's destiny to the hood of his Chevy and put his foot on the gas pedal, both literally and figuratively. He was so agitated about the matter that he confronted Sheldon's parents about her decision as well.

According to R.B. Scott, author of the insightful?Mitt Romney: An Inside Look at the Man and His Politics, Romney's only concern was for the unborn fetus. Last year, Scott, who is also a Mormon, interviewed Sheldon's 90-year-old father, Phil Hilton, who remembered the incident quite vividly.

"I have never been so upset about anything in my life," he told Scott. "[Romney] is an authoritative type fellow who thinks he is in charge of the world."

Hilton was so offended by Romney's single-mindedness and absolute lack of sensitivity to his daughter's health that he ordered the young bishop out of his home. Hilton told Scott that he was fully prepared to "throw [Romney] off the porch if he paused for even a second." Romney kept moving.

Back at the hospital, a distraught Carrel Hilton Sheldon assented to her doctor's advice and terminated her life-threatening pregnancy. She recovered from her medical crisis, moved to the West Coast, and continued to raise her four children.

And because of her ward bishop, Mitt Romney, Sheldon eventually left the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, never to return. "Here I?a baptized, endowed, dedicated worker, and tithe-payer in the church?lay helpless, hurt, and frightened, trying to maintain my psychological equilibrium," Sheldon wrote, "and his concern was for the eight-week possibility in my uterus?not for me!"

When he was confronted about the incident by reporters from the?Boston Globe?in 1994?little more than a decade afterward?Romney claimed no memory of the incident.

""I don't have any memory of what she is referring to," Romney would later declare, "although I certainly can't say it could not have been me." It became the patterned Romney response to other conflicted moments in his life (the bullying of a classmate in prep school was a similar incident). Mormon feminists came up with a term for Romney's calculated lack of memory: "Romnesia."

Disturbing Pattern

"He can seem very distant, unattached at times, almost heartless," says Judith Dushku, a lifelong Mormon and an associate professor of government at Suffolk University in Boston.

Vivacious and energetic, with sparkling blue eyes and a wide range of intellectual interests, Dushku has known Mitt Romney since the early 1970s, when they were both active in the LDS. Romney later served as her ward bishop, from 1981 to 1986, and as her stake president from 1986 until 1994, when he ran unsuccessfully for the United States Senate against Edward M. Kennedy.

Dushku was a close friend of Carrel Hilton Sheldon when Sheldon went through her experience with Romney.

"We were all terribly worried about her health," she says of Sheldon's close circle of women friends. "She had had severe medical difficulties, and the idea that she would carry the child to birth was terrifying to us. We loved her. We all expected that Mitt would support the decision of his ecclesiastical superior [the stake president] and when he denounced her and essentially shouted at her that she was wrong?that she was immoral and selfish?I thought, are you kidding me? I couldn't imagine that he would do that. I couldn't imagine?anyone?doing that."

Dushku sees a disturbing pattern in the Romney resume, one that can be traced as far back as his two years of missionary work in France, during the late 1960s.

"I don't have a sense that Mitt went on his mission to understand people, to engage them as human beings, but rather to excel in the eyes of the church," says Dushku. "It was about fulfilling an assignment, not about compassion. And that has been his?modus operandi?his entire life."

Raised in a Navy family that moved around the country, and a 1964 graduate of Brigham Young University, Dushku identifies herself as a "social democrat," so she and Romney have often found themselves on opposite sides of the fence when it comes to politics. That said, she describes the two of them of being "friends" in those early years in Boston, along with being Mormon brethren, although never seemingly on the same plane.

Dushku was a single mother of three at the time and, she says, Romney never seemed to be particularly comfortable in the company of unmarried Mormon mothers.

"I mean, if you were seated at a table with him and other Mormon men," she says, "you weren't likely to be included in the conversation. [Romney] thought that any woman that wasn't married to someone who can support them, who wasn't following church tradition in that respect, was just almost too unusual to consider in any collegial way."

Perhaps no other woman in the country?a feminist Mormon who has known Romney for nearly 40 years and who practiced in the LDS Church of Massachusetts while Romney was in various positions of church leadership there?has such a unique perspective on the Republican presidential nominee and his relationship to issues affecting women as does Dushku.

But with rare exception this campaign season?the primary anomaly being an extensive interview in?Religion Dispatches?with Joanna Brooks, author of?The Book of Mormon Girl?her voice has not been heard in the mainstream media as part of the cumulative cacophony defining Romney for the American electorate. In many ways, he's been issued a free pass on his record as a Mormon church leader, particularly in respect to his record on women and issues that impact their lives.

The journalistic vacuum is disturbing. In a lengthy profile of Romney appearing only a few weeks ago in the?New Yorker, Nicholas Lemann went through a litany of Romney's "pastoral activities" in the church: rushing over to a friend's house to help after a fire; deploying a group of Bain Capital employees to find a missing teenager; "straightening out" the "wayward son" of another stake member.

Lemann goes into great detail in an account of Romney helping a young husband apply polyurethane to his living-room floor. The spin is all in one direction. There's no reference to Sheldon or Dushku or any of the other Mormon feminists who bristled under Romney's patriarchal church leadership.

"I think some Mormons are intimidated by being put in the spotlight," Dushku says. "People are afraid to speak out against him. I know I've even felt that way. But there's another Romney that people aren't seeing?the dispassionate Romney, absolutely incapable of experiencing empathy for those in need, particularly for those who see the world differently than he does."

Tough on People

As a founder and member of the editorial board of?Exponent II, Dushku had helped usher Sheldon's anonymous account of her tribulations with Romney (then unnamed) into print in 1990. So when Romney was claiming to be a proponent of choice in his 1994 Senate race against Kennedy, Dushku knew better. She publicly identified Romney as the previously unidentified ward bishop in Sheldon's chronicle of the disquieting encounter over her pregnancy.

Moreover, she directly confronted Romney about his apparent flip-flop, which she clearly believed was politically motivated. According to Dushku, Romney told her that his change of position on the issue of choice had been approved in Salt Lake City. "They told me it was OK to take such a position in a liberal state," Romney said.

Dushku was appalled. She wanted to know that Romney really believed in choice, that it wasn't a political expediency. Dushku pushed the issue and asked him about women who might be on public assistance. Romney said he could never support the state providing for an abortion.

Dushku explained to him that for a lot of women, that position wouldn't work. Romney grew irritated with her. She pressed him again on the issue of Mormon women who had been excommunicated by the church for their feminists positions. Romney indicated he would not challenge any church decisions about excommunication. He got up to leave, declaring abruptly, "I don't think we have much to talk about."

In an interview with the Globe about Romney's Senate candidacy shortly before Election Day, Dushku acknowledged that while Romney could be "charismatic and inspirational," he could also be "dismissive" of those less privileged than him. She described him as a man who was "used to having his way." He could be "very pleasant," she noted, but at times of conflict, "he can be very tough on people."

As a self-described "Mormon feminist," Dushku had clearly grated Romney for a long time. Mormon women were expected to stay in their home?to be seen, not heard in the realm of public affairs?focusing on their families and children.

According to church prophets, women have "three principal attributes or qualities: namely, the power to bear; the ability to rear, [and] the gift to love." Most of the LDS leadership and the Romney family clearly adhered to those principles. When Dushku was organizing the Exponent II movement within the church, Mitt Romney's wife, Ann Romney, had was invited to participate but did not attend. She wasn't considered to be that "type of Mormon woman."

Dushku had her own disconcerting encounter with Romney in 1993 that, she says, "shook me up and hurt me greatly."

In spite of her lifelong commitment to feminism and her left-leaning politics, Dushku was (and remains) spiritually committed to the church and to the greater LDS community. She has had her disagreements with many of the church's teachings and many of its practices?particularly as they relate to women?but she found a spiritual comfort in the church that persists to this day.

"I'm so touched and motivated by the basic Christian teachings that I learned all of my life in the Mormon church, that that's the language that reaches me the most deeply," she acknowledged in a 2007 interview with the investigative journalist Susan Mazur, an expert on Mormon polygamy cults. "I deeply value my membership and participation in the church. It is central to my life."

A year prior to Romney's Senate campaign, Dushku sought church permission to make a pilgrimage to the ornate LDS Washington, D.C., Temple (actually located in Kensington, Maryland).

She had wanted to "receive her endowment," a sacred ritual in which Mormons pledge their allegiance to God and their faithfulness to the church. Until recently, Mormons not married to a church member were not allowed to enter an LDS temple. Dushku had never been allowed to enter a temple before?anywhere?and she wanted to "affirm her faith." Her request required approval from both her bishop and, ultimately, her stake president, Mitt Romney.

After meeting with her bishop and one of Romney's counselors (she described the interviews as "lovely" and "affirming"), she went to meet with Romney, who, she said, was confrontational and contemptuous from the start.

In an account she gave to Michael Kranish and Scott Helman for their book?The Real Romney?(an edited excerpt of which appeared in the February 2012 issue of Vanity Fair), Dushku claims that Romney said something to the effect that "I suspect, if you've gotten through both of the interviews, there's nothing I can do to keep you from going to the temple."

Dushku was startled that Romney would have the slightest interest in keeping her from making her sojourn. In fact, she says, he questioned her allegiance to the LDS religion.

"I just don't understand why you stay in the church," he said. She asked Romney if he really wanted to engage her in such a discussion. "No, actually," he replied. "I don't understand it, but I also don't care. I don't care why you do. But I can tell you one thing: you're not my kind of Mormon."

With that, Dushku recalls, Romney signed her papers and rather "dismissively" bid her adieu. She had come to Romney, in spite of their political differences, as an LDS spiritual leader and was hoping her enthusiasm to visit the temple would be met by Romney on an equal plane. Instead, Dushku told Kranish and Helman, that she felt like she had been "kicked in the stomach."

Adoption Pressure

There was yet another problematic incident that took place during Romney's tenure as ward bishop, in 1984, involving another Mormon woman, Peggie Hayes. This story also first came to light a decade later during Romney's run for the Senate, when it was first reported in the Boston Globe.

Then 24 and active in the LDS church where Romney served as ward bishop, Hayes was a divorced, single mother of a 3-year-old daughter, living in the Boston area after having bounced around from Salt Lake City to Los Angeles and then back to New England.

Her family had been close to the Romneys?she says that she served as a babysitter for the Romney children when she was a teenager?and she trusted Mitt Romney as a friend and mentor, even as a "father figure." When she was in high school, she recalls, Romney even offered her advice on dating.

In the winter of 1984, Hayes had recently given birth to a son, Dane, when Romney visited her home in the blue-collar neighborhood of Somerville. The Romneys had been good to Hayes, she says, hiring her to help clean their basement and then urging other friends to help her find odd jobs. She was expecting more of the same type of support during Romney's visit.

Instead she was "shocked" by what she heard. According to Hayes, Romney "pressured" her to give her son up for adoption through an LDS agency. At first, she thought she had misunderstood him, but much to her horror, she hadn't.

"[Romney] told me it was really important to give the baby up," Hayes said in her original interview with Globe reporters Frank Phillips and Scot Lehigh nearly two decades ago. "He told me he was a representative of the church and by refusing I was failing to comply with the church's wishes and I could be excommunicated."

Hayes took Romney's admonition as a threat. She felt attacked, even intimidated. Moreover, it was insulting: "He was saying that because Dane [her son] didn't have a Mormon father in the home and because of the circumstances of his birth?being born to a single mother?then the expectation of the church was that I give him up for adoption to the church agency so he could be raised by a Mormon couple in good standing."

There was an additional, racial component to the story that has never been reported. Hayes' first child, a girl, was African American on her father's side. "No one ever asked me to give her up for adoption," Hayes said. "They wanted my son because he was a white male who could grow up and be a member of the Mormon priesthood."

It wasn't until 1978 that the LDS Church finally lifted its ban on black men from serving in the Mormon priesthood. "I want to make it clear that I don't think Mitt was a racist," Hayes said in an interview this past week. "But the church was, and remains, a racist institution. And had my son been black, like my daughter, there wouldn't have been this push for adoption."

At the time, Romney issued a formal statement through his campaign organization acknowledging his adoption advice. "This was Peggie's second child," he declared. "At the time, Peggie was not working, had no visible means of support and was living on welfare. She was also a member of a family that had had severe problems in many different ways which, to protect Peggies's privacy, I will not go into in this statement." According to Phillips and Lehigh, Romney strongly denied any threats of excommunication and pointed out that while Hayes had rejected his advice, she remained in the church.

A close friend of Hayes, along with her aunt, however, backed up the story. "I told them what happened the very next day," says Hayes. "This wasn't something that came up later. There were other women in the church who were told the same thing," she says. "The sin was not about having the baby. The sin was not listening to the prophecy of the church."

Hayes acknowledges that there were "family issues" at the time of the incident, but bristles at the way that Romney referenced them in the press. "If I was so unfit to be a mother," she asks, "why was it OK for me to be around his sons, to babysit them, to work at their home?"

LDS officials in Salt Lake City also issued a formal announcement at the time, stating that Mormon policy dictates that unwed parents who are unable or unwilling to marry "should be encouraged to place the child for adoption, preferably through LDS social services," the official church social services agency. "Placing the infant for adoption through LDS Social Services helps ensure that the baby will be reared in a faithful Latter-day Saint family."

Romney, who was trying to position himself as a "social moderate" in one of the most liberal states in the union, was clearly irritated by both the Hayes and Sheldon revelations finding their way into the media.

In their initial reporting on the incidents, Phillips and Lehigh included a revelatory caveat about Romney's response to the charges. "While some of his actions as a church leader appear to contradict the image he is projecting as a candidate," they noted, "Romney says he was only carrying out the policies set by church elders. He has repeatedly said that, if elected, his church views would not affect public issues." (Emphasis added.) Romney was trying to distance himself from the church?and from his own record as a leader in it?as early as 1994.

Hayes didn't buy Romney's explanation then, and she doesn't buy it today. "If he was so married to the church policies then," she asks, "how is he going to shut it off if he's president?"

According to Hayes, Romney called her directly in 1994 when the story was about to break and asked her if she'd be willing to talk. Her son was about 10 at the time. She says that they spoke for about "an hour and a half." Romney, she said, "never got her name right once" in the entire conversation.

Hayes, who eventually completed her master's degree at Emerson College and today serves as Coordinator of Volunteers for the Watertown Free Public Library outside of Boston, says that "I made absolutely the best decision for that kid. He is a wonderful kid, and he loves being with me. If there is a God, I think the last thing he would have wanted is for me to give my son away just on somebody else's decision."

Hayes says that she and her son, now working as an electrician in Salt Lake City (and is not a member of the LDS Church), have "an extremely close" bond. "When I'm with my son," she says, "I know who I am. He didn't belong anywhere but with me."

When he was still an infant, Hayes says, her son needed special surgery. "I called [Romney] to come to the hospital and asked him for his blessings. He was still our bishop, our spiritual leader. He didn't come to the hospital to check up on me or my son when he was sick," says Hayes. "He sent somebody else, two people I didn't even know. That's because he didn't really care. I was really reaching out, and for him not to come, well, that was really hurtful. Once I didn't adhere to his dictates and the dictates of the church, he was done with me and my son."

And Hayes was done with the church. She, too, like Carrel Hilton Sheldon a year earlier, eventually dropped out of the church. "My son was a gift to me," she says. "And there was simply no way the church was going to take him."

Always Right

These stories involving Mormon women of different age and different status in the church community?and all taking place when Romney was in a hierarchical (and, indeed, patriarchal) position of power over them?form an alarming, composite pattern of Romney's leadership career for more than a decade in the LDS Church.

"Romney just doesn't have any sensitivity to women's issues in general," says Dushku. "But even more than that, he genuinely believes he's always right, that he's never made a mistake. He can never say, 'I might have made a mistake, I didn't understand that.' In Mitt's view, no one else has anything else to offer. He's always right."

Romney?and Republicans in general?are experiencing a significant gender gap at the polls this election season, with the most recent poll conducted by the YWCA indicating that Obama is leading Romney by 49-31 percent with women voters. In respect to issues that most directly impact women, this should come as no surprise.

"Although Romney once supported Planned Parenthood and other services for women," says Linda Bergthold, Ph. D., a national health policy consultant based in California and a frequent contributor to the Huffington Post, "he is more recently on record saying he would shut off federal funding for Planned Parenthood, a program that serves millions of women in every state. He has also said he would support the overturn of Roe v. Wade and, if elected, would likely appoint a Supreme Court judge who shares that position. He has no record of support for equal pay for women or paid family leave, issues of major importance to women. He belongs to a political party whose base wants to cut Medicaid, a program that serves poor women, children and elderly in nursing homes, by a third over the next 10 years."

As Republicans gathered in Tampa to coronate Romney as their nominee, several Republican speakers mocked the Obama slogan of "Forward," calling instead, as noted by Rebecca Traister, Salon columnist and author of Big Girls Don't Cry, for a "moment back in time" when "only a select few?the white, the male, the straight, the Protestant?could reasonably expect to exert political or financial or social or sexual power."

In word and deed, Traister observed, Republicans "have been telegraphing their hope to return us to a moment not just before Roe, but before the birth-control pill, before the sexual revolution, before second-wave feminism hammered pesky terms like 'harassment' and 'equal pay' into our lexicon, to a moment when women's bodies and sexuality and identities were men's to define, patrol and violate at will." Romney, it would appear, is the perfect Republican candidate to bring us back to that patriarchal future.

Of course, one could argue that Romney's backward-looking view of the world is not limited exclusively to women's issues. In respect to economic policies, he would clearly like to revert to the days before workplace safety mandates, the progressive income tax, the right of workers to organize and regulatory controls of financial institutions.

His doubletalk at the first presidential debate last week in Denver about his various economic proposals?many of which directly contradict previous statements he has made?only help to underscore what Dushku has called his "capacity for duplicity" and "his lack of a moral center."

When Romney uttered his now-immortal comments at a Republican fundraiser in Boca Raton, Florida, about 47 percent of Americans being "victims" who think "that government has the responsibility to care for them," Dushku says that we were seeing the "real Romney."

"He sees other people in need as lazy and slackers," Dushku notes. "He doesn't acknowledge that the path he took was a privileged path, from his parents, that gave him distinct advantages."

Romney likes to say that his controversial role at Bain Capital was to "help out" other companies or "assist them" or "provide business expertise." It's a narrative that completely obfuscates the role that Romney and Bain were actually executing with their leveraged buyouts. Romney & Co. were corporate pirates?nothing more and nothing less?in the worst sense of the term.

In what has been the most important work of investigative journalism dealing with Romney's real record at Bain Capital (Rolling Stone, Aug. 29), Matt Taibbi described Bain's business practices as being driven by a "make-nothing, take-everything, screw-everyone ethos" and Romney himself as a "Gordon Gekko?without the PR."

Taibii chronicled a sordid history of Bain takeovers in which Romney saddled the companies with huge debt payments, leaving others holding the bag. "In the past few decades," Taibbi asserted, "Romney has piled more debt onto more unsuspecting companies, written more gigantic checks that other people have to cover, than perhaps all but a handful of people on planet Earth."

Of course, many of the victims of Romney's corporate raiders were women?clerical workers and mid-level administrators and line workers?whose jobs were vulnerable when Bain plundered them for profits. Romney's leadership team at Bain?like the national LDS leadership?was all-white and all-male.

In whatever he does?whether it be at Bain or with his work as head of the Olympics or most notably in his run for the presidency?Romney casts himself as a white knight in shining armor coming to the rescue: of a failing business, of the Olympics, of the national economy. But his real record at Bain thoroughly contradicts the narrative of him being a so-called "turnaround specialist."

As Taibbi notes, "In the Bain model, the actual turnaround isn't necessary. It's just a cover story." Huge cash returns are extracted on Bain's behalf, Taibbi noted, "whether the captured firm thrives or not."

The Republican presidential nominee was effective at Bain, Taibbi concludes, but not in the way that he and his inner sanctum tout. "Romney is the front man and apostle of an economic revolution," Taibbi concludes, "in which transactions are manufactured instead of products, wealth is generated without accompanying prosperity, and Cayman Islands partnerships are lovingly erected and nurtured while American communities fall apart."

"He sees it as simply a job that a venture capitalist does," says Dushku. "When a venture fails, when a corporation goes under, there's no guilt. No compassion. He simply sees it as a job. Because he doesn't understand what it means to be out of work, again, no sympathy nor empathy. 'I put them out of work, no problem.' He completely trusts that the private sector is going to serve as the ultimate safety net, that the market will serve as the corrective. And as we all know, it doesn't work that way."

Crushed

Earlier this year, Dushku's daughter, the actress Eliza Dushku (of television's Buffy the Vampire Slayer fame), got cornered at a benefit dinner by a reporter for New York Magazine and was queried about her family relationship with the Romneys.

"I mean, he went from being my first crush at 6 years old," Eliza Dushku recalled, "and then when I was old enough to hear what was coming out of his mouth, it was over. I'm sure he's a nice guy. I knew him to be a nice person, to those around him. He had five sons that I knew, that my brothers would play with growing up, and they were kind to others. But what they stand for I don't find to be tolerant or just."

The resulting headline declared, of course, "Eliza Dushku Recalls Her Childhood Crush on Mitt Romney"?and her more critical position about tolerance and justice was buried beneath the focus on the "crush."

Her mother, Judith, says that her daughter received little LDS criticism for her comments (although some were certainly published at various places online), largely because Eliza is dismissed as a nonpracticing member of the church. "Mormons circle the wagons," the elder Dushku says, "and you're either inside the circle or you're not. It's a very insular community."

Judith Dushku has been the victim of such circling throughout the years and has been specifically targeted by Mitt Romney. After his loss to Ted Kennedy in the Massachusetts Senate race, Dushku went up to Romney to congratulate him on running a competitive campaign.

Dushku says that while Romney "didn't say anything really nasty," his displeasure with her was bristling at the surface. "He told me he was angry with me and didn't ever want to talk to me again," Dushku recalls. She was taken aback by his response. She thought that in spite of their political differences, that they could at least remain cordial. "No," Romney said, "that isn't possible."

Eight years later, following Romney's victory in the Massachusetts governor's race (during which Dushku had once again been a vocal Romney critic), LDS leaders quietly redrew the Boston-area church districts so that Romney and Dushku were no longer in the same ward. According to Romney's biographer R.B. Scott, the maneuver became known as the "Dushku gerrymander," and the Romneys were now free from encountering Dushku at their place of worship.

Dushku says she never knew about the purpose of the redistricting, but she didn't seem disturbed by the outcome. "That way we both didn't have to see each other," she says wryly.

Place of Privelege

The LDS church claims to be apolitical, asserting that "the church does not endorse political parties or candidates, nor does it permit the use of its buildings for political purposes. The church does not participate in politics unless there is a moral question at issue, in which case the church will often speak out."

But the church drew the ire of many?both inside and outside LDS community?in 2008 when it strongly supported the passage of Proposition 8 in California opposing gay marriage, and during the 1970s and 1980s, it served as a bastion for opposition to the Equal Rights Amendment. Church leadership has also come to Romney's defense whenever he has been criticized for adhering to LDS policies or principals.

In recent weeks, David Twede, a fifth-generation Mormon who has posted several blogs critical of Romney at MormonThink.com, was threatened with excommunication by his ward bishop and stake president in Orlando, Florida, for "apostasy." While his disciplinary hearing was rescheduled for a "later date," Twede says that he was told by church leaders to "cease and desist" his criticisms of Romney.

On the other hand, Mona Williams, an LDS member from Price, Utah, sent out an email to fellow church members that went viral in the LDS community and that urged Mormons to fast and pray for Romney on the Sunday prior to the first presidential debates.

"I know that seems like such a small thing," Williams wrote, "but I believe 'from small things, great things can come about.' I know that fasting and praying brings about miracles."

Romney's fellow Mormon, Glenn Beck, the controversial right-wing talk radio host, speculated about a Romney victory at the polls by noting, "I think God is trying to make this so clear to us that, if it happens, it's His finger."

Dushku says she's not surprised by the support inside the church for Romney's candidacy. "He's pushing the church into the mainstream," she says, "and that's something they've always wanted. In that sense, it's affirming."

But she also thinks she speaks for many Mormons, particularly women, when she says, "He's simply not one of us. I really think a lot of Mormon women feel that way."

Last week, as Dushku watched the first of the presidential debates, she saw a competent, even "slick" politician sparring with President Obama, but she also witnessed someone who is a political chameleon.

"He's not a man who has anything like a moral core," she says. "He's very loyal to the Mormon church, pays his tithing, is faithful to his wife, and so on, but he doesn't have a set of core values you can count on. I've known him for nearly 40 years. He may have a different suit on, but he hasn't changed. His experience hasn't changed. His performance was very consistent with the Mitt I knew back then. He can't relate to average working women?teachers and nurses and care givers. He's still coming from a place of privilege and entitlement."

Peggie Hayes?who doesn't know Dushku?concurs with her assessment. The prospect of Romney becoming president, she says, "is a horrible idea. It would be terrible." She says Romney's recent positioning as a moderate "is a mask."

"I've known him since I was 13," she says. The Mormon leader who tried to impose church doctrine on her when she was experiencing some difficult challenges in her life hasn't changed. "Not a bit. That's exactly who he was," she declared. "And that's exactly who he is."


Source.

Looooong, but worth the read.?

Source: http://ontd-political.livejournal.com/10112259.html

my fair lady conversion disorder the chronicle spinal stenosis the forgotten man mike jones just friends

Wednesday, October 17, 2012

New-fangled, old-timey LED lantern

The Olde Brooklyn Lantern has an unusual look for an LED lamp. ?Instead of the sleek, modern look LED lighting usually has, it looks like an old-fashioned lantern like my Dad used to use for camping. ?Inside are 9 ultra-bright dimmable LEDs that are said to last 100,000 hours. ?The lantern requires two D-cell batteries, [...]

Source: http://the-gadgeteer.com/2012/10/17/new-fangled-old-timey-led-lantern/

Kate Middleton photos Chi Magazine Kate Middleton Nude Photos glee glee wii u wii u

Thursday, October 11, 2012

'Walking Dead' Season Three: What You Need To Know

From the initial outbreak to Shane's death, here's our cheat sheet on the 'Walking Dead' saga ahead of the season three premiere.
By Josh Wigler


Norman Reedus, Andrew Lincoln and Steven Yeun in the "Walking Dead" season three premiere
Photo: Gene Page/ AMC

Source: http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1695217/walking-dead-season-three-premiere-preview.jhtml

abc store nate diaz vs donald cerrone ufc 141 lesnar vs overeem appetizer recipes alistair overeem alistair overeem

Environmental nonprofit's donation tough to figure

By Michael BeckelCenter for Public Integrity

?Environmentalists punish companies without protecting people? is the headline of a column that appeared on the website of the American Action Forum a year ago.

The group has called for increased domestic production of oil, coal and natural gas. Officials there have criticized President Barack Obama?s ?eagerness to speed our progression to a low-carbon economy? and argued that the administration is ?regulating coal out of existence.?

The American Action Forum is also connected with a nonprofit and a super PAC that have spent millions of dollars on ads backing anti-regulation Republican candidates since 2010.

So why did the Energy Foundation, a San Francisco-based organization that funds the Sierra Club, the National Resources Defense Council, the Environmental Defense Fund and Earthjustice give the conservative nonprofit a six-figure donation last year?


Records obtained by the Center for Public Integrity show that the Energy Foundation, touted as the ?leading funder of projects that address climate change,? awarded the American Action Forum a $125,000 grant in 2011 for ?high-level outreach and communications around carbon policy.?

Jenny Coyle, a spokeswoman for the Energy Foundation, says her organization is ?proud to fund a wide variety of organizations whether they are viewed as progressive or conservative.?

?Clean energy is not a partisan issue,? Coyle continued. ?We believe that all demographics and groups will see the benefits of a prosperous and healthy clean energy economy.?

Officials at the American Action Forum declined to comment about the grant.

Center for Public Integrity: Donation tough to figure?

According to records filed with the Internal Revenue Service, the Energy Foundation doled out more than $97 million in grants in 2010 to projects aimed at?the adoption of stronger fuel efficiency standards for vehicles, the promotion of renewable energy technologies and the retirement of existing coal-fired power plants, among others.

Against that backdrop, the American Action Forum stands out as an unlikely beneficiary.

The group is not?known as an environmental advocate. One of its projects tracks coal plants in the U.S.?that are likely to close down under the Obama administration?s new ?regulatory burdens.?

American Action Forum?s president is Douglas Holtz-Eakin, who headed the Congressional Budget Office under President George W. Bush, served as top adviser to 2008 GOP presidential nominee John McCain and has had stints as a visiting fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute. Its board includes former Nixon operative Fred Malek, former GOP Sen. Norm Coleman of Minnesota, former GOP Gov. Tom Ridge of Pennsylvania and former GOP Gov. Jeb Bush of Florida.

Craig Holman, a lobbyist for the consumer group Public Citizen ? which has also received grants from the Energy Foundation ? says the American Action Forum ?is not dedicated to clean energy.?

He says the group favors deregulation and ending federal subsidies for renewable energy technologies that would tilt the playing field toward ?established, traditional dirty sources of energy.?

Catrina Rorke, the director of energy policy at the American Action Forum, argues that federal subsidies ?are not the best tool to integrate new fuels into the market.?

?We don?t want to preferentially support one kind of energy over another,? Rorke said.

Organized under section 501(c)(3) of the U.S. tax code, American Action Forum is focused on policy research and is affiliated with the American Action Network, which engages in advocacy as a ?social welfare? group organized under section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The groups are also linked to a super PAC called the Congressional Leadership Fund.

All three organizations share office space and personnel, with Coleman and Malek playing leadership roles in each.

Malek founded both the American Action Network, where he is still a board member, and the American Action Forum, where he serves as chairman of the board. He also is a board member of the Congressional Leadership Fund.

Coleman, meanwhile, is a board member of the American Action Forum and is the chairman of both the American Action Network and the Congressional Leadership Fund.

Veteran GOP operative Brian Walsh ? who served as the National Republican Congressional Committee?s political director during the 2010 election cycle ? is the president of both the American Action Network and Congressional Leadership Fund, which have run a plethora of attack ads against Democrats.

Records filed with the Federal Election Commission show that during the 2010 election cycle alone, American Action Network reported spending more than $18 million on political advertisements ? more than any other ?social welfare? nonprofit, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

In this fall?s hotly contested race in Minnesota?s 8th District, it has attacked Democrat Rick Nolan for siding with the Environmental Protection Agency against a mining company. Nolan?s campaign has said the former congressman will support the mining industry ?without rolling back environmental and safety regulations for workers."

Similarly, in the highly competitive race in Ohio?s 16th District, the Congressional Leadership Fund has spent more than $1 million on ads blasting Democratic Rep. Betty Sutton. Among the reasons given to oppose Sutton in November? Her vote during the 111th Congress in support of the so-called ?cap-and-trade? legislation, which sought to establish both a cap on carbon emissions and a requirement that large utilities in each state increase the percentage of electricity they produce from renewable sources.

Donors to the Congressional Leadership Fund include Alpha Natural Resources, one of the country?s leading producers of coal, which made a $5,000 donation from its corporate treasury in April.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, the Congressional Leadership Fund has also received contributions from the political action committees connected to the Nuclear Energy Institute, the Edison Electric Institute, energy conglomerate Koch Industries, oil refining giant Valero Energy and Exelon, which is the largest nuclear power plant operator in the U.S.?and last year was awarded a $646 million loan guarantee by the Department of Energy for one of its solar generation subsidiaries.

Super donors Sheldon Adelson, the billionaire casino owner from Nevada, and Bob Perry, the millionaire home builder from Texas, have both given generously to the Congressional Leadership Fund.

Neither American Action Forum nor American Action Network is required to publicly disclose donor information.

A review of IRS filings by the Center for Responsive Politics, however, found that donors to the American Action Network include the Republican Jewish Coalition, the American Natural Gas Alliance and Crossroads GPS, the nonprofit sister organization of conservative super PAC juggernaut American Crossroads.

The Center for Public Integrity?is a nonprofit independent Investigative news outlet.?

More from Open Channel:

?

Source: http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/10/11/14364829-why-did-environmental-nonprofit-donate-to-conservative-pro-coal-group?lite

global payments the killing eli young band wrestlemania country music awards 2012 wrestlemania 28 results earl scruggs